「宣言
我が祖国の為めに、死なう!!!
我が主義の為めに、死なう!!!
我が宗教の為めに、死なう!!!
我が盟主の為めに、死なう!!!
我が同志の為めに、死なう!!!
　　　　　　日蓮会青年部」

悠久한 歷史와 傳統에 빛나는 우리 大韓國民은 3·1運動으로 建立된 大韓民國臨時政府의 法統과 不義에 抗拒한 4·19民主理念을 계승하고, 祖國의 民主改革과 平和的 統一의 使命에 입각하여 正義...

谈手淫？拜托！

谈论手淫需要勇气

Laqueur's celebrated 1990 book, Making Sex—on the medical discovery or invention of sexual difference— had a significant impact on a wide range of fields, from the history of science to gender studies, from literary criticism to art history. Discovery or invention: the shared understanding of the difference between men and women was transformed, Laqueur argued, less because of empirical discoveries than because of a complex social reevaluation. His book showed that in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries people gradually shifted from a one-sex model—in which the woman's body was viewed as a providentially inferior version of the man's—to a two-sex model, in which the organs of generation were understood to be quite distinct. That is, they gave up the ancient idea that the vagina was in effect an unborn penis [...]

[...] I would invite my friend and former Berkeley colleague Thomas Laqueur, who was, I knew, working on an ambitious new book that brought together the history of medicine with cultural history, psychology, theology, and literature.
[...]
Laqueur's most recent book, Solitary Sex: A Cultural History of Masturbation, shares with Making Sex the same startling initial premise [...]

Small wonder then that he seemed a person whose writings and lecture would enliven the semester for the undergraduates in History and Literature. In fact he did enliven the semester, but a strange thing happened along the way: there was a tremendous outbreak of the jitters. Panic set in not among the students—a large number of whom must have come of age watching There's Something About Mary— but among the core of instructors who lead the seminars and conduct the tutorials. Though sophisticated and highly trained, when they were faced with the prospect of discussing the history of masturbation with the students, many of them blanched. Coprophagia wouldn't have fazed them at all, sodomy wouldn't have slowed them down, incest would have actively interested them—but masturbation: please, anything but that.

终于不是抄这篇的了 -_-

手淫引起的焦虑

At a Miami news conference, President Bill Clinton said that her views on the subject reflected "differences with administration policy and my own convictions." Masturbation is virtually unique, in the array of more or less universal human behaviors, in arousing a peculiar and peculiarly intense current of anxiety.

This anxiety, Laqueur observes, is not found in all cultures and is not part of our own culture's distant origins. In ancient Greece and Rome, masturbation could be the object of transitory embarrassment or mockery, but it had little or no medical or, as far as we can tell, cultural significance. More surprisingly, Laqueur argues, it is almost impossible to find in ancient Jewish thought. This claim at first seems dubious because in Genesis 38 we read that Onan "spilled his seed upon the ground," an act that so displeased the Lord that He struck him dead. Onanism indeed became a synonym for masturbation, but not for the rabbis who produced the Talmuds and midrashim. For them the sin of Onan was not masturbation but a willful refusal to procreate. [...] Some commentators [...] seem close to condemning such pleasure, but on closer inspection these commentators too are concerned with the wasting of semen.

Medieval Christian theologians, by contrast, did have a clear concept of masturbation as a sin, but it was not, Laqueur claims, a sin in which they had particularly intense interest. With the exception of the fifth-century abbot John Cassian, they were far more concerned with what Laqueur calls the ethics of social sexuality than they were with the ethics of solitary sex. What mattered most were "perversions of sexuality as perversions of social life, not as a withdrawal into asocial autarky." Within the monastery anxiety focused far more on sodomy than on masturbation, while in the world at large it focused more on incest, bestiality, fornication, and adultery. (显然没有译好，m按） [...]
[...] To be sure, Protestants vehemently castigated Catholics for creating institutions—monasteries and convents— that in their view denigrated marriage and inevitably fostered masturbation. [...]

更に、その愛という言葉が、人間同士の思いちがいや、だましあいの媒介物となったのは、いつの頃からでしょう。そして、愛という字が近代の偽善と自己欺瞞のシムボルのようになったのはいつの時代からでしょうか。三文文士がこの字で幼稚な読者をごまかし、説教壇からこの字を叫んで戦争を煽動し、最も軽薄な愛人たちが、彼等のさまざまなモメントに、愛を囁いて、一人一人男や女をだましています。

台羅版拼音系統昨闖關成功後，余伯泉氣憤地說，台羅系統的起源是台灣閩南語音標系統（ＴＬＰＡ），是國民黨時代的產物，而二○○二通用拼音是民進黨執政內通過的，質疑為何教育部無法捍衛執政黨的閩南語拼音系統主張，教育部斷然通過台羅版，台灣語通用聯盟後續將準備抗爭。